Apr 2010
Was the Polish President Murdered?
27/04/10 09:12 Filed in: Personal
I’ve been holding a little reservation on running this story, but the sheer lack of any news agency offering up the story has forced me into thinking it needs a wider audience. If only for critique purposes.
On the 10th of April 2010 the President, his wife and number of senior officials of the Polish Government died in a plane crash just outside Smolensk Air Base in what are described as foggy conditions. (I say ‘described’ because the fog is pretty hard to see in ether the leaked video or the official video.)
All 96 on board were killed.
Now here is where it gets a little unusual. Just a few days after the tragedy a video is released on YouTube (amongst others) show the plane shortly after the crash and reporting to show individuals on the plane being ‘shot’ where they lie. In other words, they were murdered AFTER the crash.
So far I’ve found NO mention of this video in Western media AT ALL. With two exceptions
1. Alex Jones’s Prison Planet has ran the story from the start
2. The No Agenda Show talked about the incident and the video in one of their recent Podcasts.
Russia Today Footage
The shooting video
On the 10th of April 2010 the President, his wife and number of senior officials of the Polish Government died in a plane crash just outside Smolensk Air Base in what are described as foggy conditions. (I say ‘described’ because the fog is pretty hard to see in ether the leaked video or the official video.)
All 96 on board were killed.
Now here is where it gets a little unusual. Just a few days after the tragedy a video is released on YouTube (amongst others) show the plane shortly after the crash and reporting to show individuals on the plane being ‘shot’ where they lie. In other words, they were murdered AFTER the crash.
So far I’ve found NO mention of this video in Western media AT ALL. With two exceptions
1. Alex Jones’s Prison Planet has ran the story from the start
2. The No Agenda Show talked about the incident and the video in one of their recent Podcasts.
Russia Today Footage
The shooting video
More trouble for the Met Office
25/04/10 09:32 Filed in: Personal
I can’t say I’ve got a lot of sympathy for the Met. Office. After all, this is the organisation that claimed
So, you might be wondering what their latest gaff is. Well, it was the Met Office who were in charge of making sure our skies were safe from the DEADLY ASH CLOUD OF DOOM!
Incidentally the whole ground stop fiasco cost airlines £1.3 billion and left over 150,000 Britons stranded around the world (including a number of people I know).
The Daily Mail has pulled its finger out and actually done some JOURNALISM and discovered that;
Jim McKenna of the Civil Aviation Authority's head of Airworthiness, Strategy and Policy, admitted last night: 'It's obvious that at the start of this crisis there was a lack of definitive data. It's also true that for some of the time, the density of ash above the UK was close to undetectable.'
Back to the Met Office. Despite the initial eruption on March 20, they went ahead with the repaint of their BAE 146 atmospheric survey jet. As a result, samples then had to be taken using an unpressurised and far lower flying turbo-prop Dornier 228.
But what really added to the sheer ineptitude of the Met Office was that the most essential bit of equipment, the optical particle counting instrument, used to measure the concentration of ash, was NOT FITTED. No room you see. What with the coffee machine, mini-fridge etc
The full story can be found here.
- Last year would be a BBQ summer - It was a wash out.
- Last winter would be ‘very mild’ - It was the coldest in half a century
- Spring would come early - NOPE!
So, you might be wondering what their latest gaff is. Well, it was the Met Office who were in charge of making sure our skies were safe from the DEADLY ASH CLOUD OF DOOM!
Incidentally the whole ground stop fiasco cost airlines £1.3 billion and left over 150,000 Britons stranded around the world (including a number of people I know).
The Daily Mail has pulled its finger out and actually done some JOURNALISM and discovered that;
- The Meteorological Office was unable to actually physically measure the density of the ash because its plane was being repainted and was only flown on Tuesday; the day before the ban was lifted.
- The ‘computer model’ used by the Met Office produced a whole series of maps predicting that the volcanic ash would affect a vast area reaching as far west as Newfoundland and as far east as Russia. But in reality, physical samples proved this model to be totally false *1.
- When the ash WAS over Britain, the maximum density measured by scientists was only 1/20th of the minimum safe limit proposed by aircraft and engine manufacturers.
Jim McKenna of the Civil Aviation Authority's head of Airworthiness, Strategy and Policy, admitted last night: 'It's obvious that at the start of this crisis there was a lack of definitive data. It's also true that for some of the time, the density of ash above the UK was close to undetectable.'
Back to the Met Office. Despite the initial eruption on March 20, they went ahead with the repaint of their BAE 146 atmospheric survey jet. As a result, samples then had to be taken using an unpressurised and far lower flying turbo-prop Dornier 228.
But what really added to the sheer ineptitude of the Met Office was that the most essential bit of equipment, the optical particle counting instrument, used to measure the concentration of ash, was NOT FITTED. No room you see. What with the coffee machine, mini-fridge etc
The full story can be found here.
Jamanji TURNS EVIL!
23/04/10 19:40 Filed in: Personal
I’ve realised how negative my blog has got over the last few months. So I thought I’d share this with everyone.
Hey kids... imagine Jumanji turned EVIL. Now make a teen horror flick.
It’s the very obscurely titled “The Black Wates of Echo’s Pond”
Hey kids... imagine Jumanji turned EVIL. Now make a teen horror flick.
It’s the very obscurely titled “The Black Wates of Echo’s Pond”
Everest is shrinking... now guess the reason
20/04/10 14:25 Filed in: Personal
Heard somebody comment that Mount Everest is a little shorter than it used to be. Well, we all get smaller with age, right? So I did a look around and came across a CBBC webpage that highlights the story and explains it all for the kids of the UK (and abroad).
The only trouble is that the whole article is a propaganda piece for the Pro-Global Warming cabal. The original CBBC article can be found here.
But to save you time AND I don’t give a crap, here is the article.
I’ve used italics to highlight both the propaganda phrase and the ACTUAL explanation for the change. You’ll notice that the sub-heading gets the lie while the body of the article contains the reality. I’m assuming the idea is that kids, in a hurry, don’t bother reading the whole article and are instead just affected by the headline elements.
Further to this, if heavy glaciers are removed from Everest, it would more likely GROW. In the same way that Scotland is rising out of the North Sea and has been doing so since the end of the last ice age. This movement, incidentally, is causing London to since into the sea.
Just how tall is Mount Everest?
The world's tallest mountain, Everest is to be re-measured after a recent survey suggested the summit is getting smaller because of global warming.
In March, a Chinese climbing team will use satellite and radar technology to find out its actual height.
The size of Everest has been in debate since it was first measured in 1856 as 8,839 meters tall.
But in 1954 an Indian survey recorded 8,848 m but in 1999 a US study suggested it was two meters higher.
Whatever the team discovers, the movement of the earth's tectonic plates, means Everest's height changes a little each year.
The only trouble is that the whole article is a propaganda piece for the Pro-Global Warming cabal. The original CBBC article can be found here.
But to save you time AND I don’t give a crap, here is the article.
I’ve used italics to highlight both the propaganda phrase and the ACTUAL explanation for the change. You’ll notice that the sub-heading gets the lie while the body of the article contains the reality. I’m assuming the idea is that kids, in a hurry, don’t bother reading the whole article and are instead just affected by the headline elements.
Further to this, if heavy glaciers are removed from Everest, it would more likely GROW. In the same way that Scotland is rising out of the North Sea and has been doing so since the end of the last ice age. This movement, incidentally, is causing London to since into the sea.
Mount Everest getting smaller?
Just how tall is Mount Everest?
The world's tallest mountain, Everest is to be re-measured after a recent survey suggested the summit is getting smaller because of global warming.
In March, a Chinese climbing team will use satellite and radar technology to find out its actual height.
The size of Everest has been in debate since it was first measured in 1856 as 8,839 meters tall.
But in 1954 an Indian survey recorded 8,848 m but in 1999 a US study suggested it was two meters higher.
Whatever the team discovers, the movement of the earth's tectonic plates, means Everest's height changes a little each year.
Astronomer Royal for Scotland says Sun DOES affect climate
13/04/10 20:05 Filed in: Personal
Professor John Brown, the Astronomer Royal for Scotland is my new best friend. Why?
Well, on this months Sky at Night he basically stated the truth that both the IPCC and the CRU would rather you not know. That sun spot activities and climate ARE somehow connected.
Here is a small transcript of the exchange.
Patrick Moore - “The solar cycle does affect our climate and our weather. There is no question about that.”
Prof. John Brown - “It does. There was a great lack of sunspots for a number of years and there was a lot of talk ‘oh, the suns changing’ and so on.
And I even had a number of people asking ‘Could this lack of sunspots be responsible for all this snow over Britain?’.
I’m afraid the Sun is not that choosey.
But overall it does seem there is a connection to some extent. Because we had this very pronounced Mondum Minimum period a few centuries ago”
Patrick Moore - “1625 - 1715. Thames froze every year.”
Prof. John Brown - “So you have less sun spots and much colder weather. So there IS some rather subtle connection.”
The full program is currently available on iPlayer and I will attempt to find an alternative source for the purpose of comment / education / critique.
Well, on this months Sky at Night he basically stated the truth that both the IPCC and the CRU would rather you not know. That sun spot activities and climate ARE somehow connected.
Here is a small transcript of the exchange.
Patrick Moore - “The solar cycle does affect our climate and our weather. There is no question about that.”
Prof. John Brown - “It does. There was a great lack of sunspots for a number of years and there was a lot of talk ‘oh, the suns changing’ and so on.
And I even had a number of people asking ‘Could this lack of sunspots be responsible for all this snow over Britain?’.
I’m afraid the Sun is not that choosey.
But overall it does seem there is a connection to some extent. Because we had this very pronounced Mondum Minimum period a few centuries ago”
Patrick Moore - “1625 - 1715. Thames froze every year.”
Prof. John Brown - “So you have less sun spots and much colder weather. So there IS some rather subtle connection.”
The full program is currently available on iPlayer and I will attempt to find an alternative source for the purpose of comment / education / critique.